Stephen King on inspiration behind “End of Watch,” 2016 politics
When it comes to the art of storytelling, few do it better than Stephen King. Mercedes,” and why he is concerned about Donald Trump’s candidacy for president.
. King joins “CBS This Morning” to discuss “End of Watch,” the final part of his bestselling Bill Hodges trilogy that started with “Mr. For over 40 years, filmmakers have turned to King’s library for inspiration. His success began in 1974 with “Carrie.” He has since written more than 50 books, selling more than 350 million copies
Fighter Jack Johnson, for instance, represents the 1900s; basketball star Michael Jordan defines the 1990s.
In decades between, readers will find lengthy pieces on Jim Thorpe, Babe Ruth, Joe Louis and Babe Didrikson, Joe DiMaggio and Ted Williams, Johnny Unitas, Bill Russell, Muhammad Ali, and Pete Rose.
”I think it’s a labor of love for everybody who was involved with it,” says Schaap, the author of several sports books, the former editor of Sports Magazine and current host of ESPN’s “Sports Reporters.” Schaap, who praised ESPN’s Mark Shapiro for organizing the book, writes about Unitas.
October 25, 1999
Web posted at: 2:08 p.m. Unitas sort of represented that.”
’Who would win most?’
So, who did Schaap vote as his greatest athlete ever? Let the debate begin. 14; the top athlete remains a mystery, though the list has been narrowed to a chosen few.
And to compliment the show, the sports network that started in 1979 has released a new book by the same title.
”My top three were Jim Brown, Wilt Chamberlain and Bo Jackson,” says Schaap. Schaap says the former Baltimore Colts quarterback, like many athletes, has become a symbol of the era in which he played.
”I always thought of him as a stoic, solid person, that I think was typical of that era of the 1950s,” says Schaap. The athlete ranked in that spot: Secretariat, the 1973 Triple Crown winner. “We don’t have Pele in there. Even if I didn’t think he should be up that high, I like the controversy it created.”
But Schaap points out that the list has another source of contention.
”We are limiting it to North Americans,” he says. EDT (1808 GMT)
By Jamie Allen
CNN Interactive Senior Writer
(CNN) — The sport of watching sports, for those who don’t know much about sports, is really the debate of it all. 35. “If you have a vote for the most significant athlete, then you have Ali, then you have Babe Ruth, then you have Michael Jordan. So far, they’ve reached No. My complaint was that he only played one sport.
”I also love the controversy of it. The compendium, published by Hyperion, features recollections on the sports century that was by top writers and sportscasters, including Dick Schaap, Joyce Carol Oates, Chris Berman, David Halberstam, Roy Blount Jr., and Thomas Boswell.
The book is divided into decades, with at least one athlete highlighted as the defining athlete of that time period. He realizes that his picks might not top the ultimate ESPN list — Jackson is not even offered in the network’s Top 20 — but he thinks he used a different scale to appraise athletes.
”I did not choose necessarily on the basis of significance,” says Schaap. It seems some thought the list should only list human athletes.
”I think anybody is entitled to vote for whomever they want, and I think Secretariat does qualify as an athlete,” says Schaap. They changed the face of sports. “People came out of the war years with great hope and great faith in the future. They changed the face of sports.”
– sportswriter Dick Schaap
But as any sports fan knows, ESPN has been trying to do just that with its ongoing series, “ESPN SportsCentury.” The network, using the opinions of sports reporters, authors, academics and observers, is counting down its top 100 athletes of all time. Couch potatoes and bar patrons tuning in to the latest televised contest inevitably battle it out over who is the greatest boxer, the greatest baseball team, the greatest golfer or the greatest quarterback.
And then there’s the ultimate debate: Who is the greatest athlete of all time?
Trying to compare competitors from different athletic endeavors — Muhammad Ali and Jim Thorpe, Michael Jordan and Babe Ruth, Bo Jackson and, uh, Bo Jackson — proves a nearly impossible task.
”If you have a vote for the most significant athlete, then you have Ali, then you have Babe Ruth, then you have Michael Jordan. But I voted purely on what I considered to be athletic ability, and if I had anything in the back of my mind it was, ‘If you put these guys on a field and they played each other in 20 sports, who would win the most?’ I think Jim Brown would win the most, and I think Chamberlain would be awfully close.”
’I love the controversy of it’
The ESPN pick that caused the biggest grumble from sports fans was No. “(But) I wouldn’t have voted him very high. So we missed Pele, but we had Secretariat.”
And the debates continue.
Halberstam: ‘Best American Sports Writing’ a window on the century
June 7, 1999
Feinstein’s ‘Majors’ goes behind the scenes of golf’s big four
May 7, 1999
Review: ‘The Muhammad Ali Reader’
March 10, 1999
Reviewer: Book on Ali ‘interesting, but awkward’
August 31, 1998
Check out the latest sports on CNNSI.com
Note: Pages will open in a new browser window
External sites are not endorsed by CNN Interactive.
LATEST BOOK STORIES:
Cornwell’s ‘Sharpe’ digs into history